Corona: Why are we not willing to learn from Asia?

Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen speaks about the coronavirus situation in Taiwan during a news conference at the Centers for Disease Control in Taipei in early February [File: Fabian Hamacher/Reuters]

By Rainer Zitelmann

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” These words are among the trove of wisdom passed down to us by the Chinese philosopher Confucius.

Copying others is the quickest way to learn anything. Young children learn everything by copying their parents. And children are incredibly fast learners. As adults, we like to emphasize the originality of our thinking and we tend to feel ashamed of copying others – this is especially true for Europeans and Americans. But Asians think differently.

As King Solomon taught: The wise man learns from the mistakes of others, the fool has to learn from his own:

  • In business, there is nothing unusual about analysing successful companies and trying to learn from their business models by identifying examples of “best practice.” As Sam Walton, founder of the major American retail chain Walmart, once admitted: “Most everything I’ve done I’ve copied from somebody else.” So successful were his methods that they made him one of the wealthiest Americans.
  • The same is true of sports, where people spend a great deal of time analyzing better teams’ strategies to try to learn from them.

It’s only in politics that no one seems capable of learning from other countries’ experiences, at least that seems to be the case in Europe and the U.S. In the battle against Covid-19, chaos and contradiction reign as measures are introduced on an almost daily basis: lockdown today, everything open again tomorrow and another lockdown the day after tomorrow. In Europe and the U.S., we have seen government failure on a massive scale – and shouldn’t really come as a surprise. After all, governments are not only failing in the fight against the coronavirus, they are failing in a host of other areas too. For years now, Europe has been unable to secure its borders effectively. And public infrastructure is in a catastrophic state – in Europe as well as in the U.S. In Europe, governments are focused solely on making people happy with a never-ending stream of social programmes and, with a constant flood of over-regulation, undermining the economy at every turn. Germany is a particularly sad example, because right now the country’s leading industry –automotive manufacturing – is being consciously destroyed under the weight of planned economy regulations.

All across Europe, citizens’ rights and freedoms are being trampled on – the only (apparent) exception seems to be in the arena of data protection. What other explanation could there possibly be for the fact that in Germany, for example, a Covid-19 app has been developed that does a fantastic job of protecting data, but not people? The app has contributed absolutely nothing to fighting the pandemic. In this, it has much in common with lots of other measures that are even worse than doing nothing because they only create false illusions.

Why do you need a dictatorship to provide enough tests for people? Nobody is saying that we should blindly copy China. But who would seriously object to learning from them?

According to current forecasts, many European countries are about to exhaust their testing capacities. In China, nine million inhabitants were recently tested in a single city in five days. China built a 1,000-bed hospital in one and a half weeks. But as soon as you start talking about China, people react reflexively and complain that China is a dictatorship and has nothing to teach free societies. Why do you need a dictatorship to provide enough tests for people? Nobody is saying that we should blindly copy China. But who would seriously object to learning from them?

At the beginning of the coronavirus crisis in Germany, Chancellor Merkel declared that masks were completely ineffective. Trump also spent months ridiculing people who wore masks. This puzzled me at the time. So why do populations across Asia, who have far more experience of epidemics, overwhelmingly wear masks?

Incidentally, China isn’t the only country we can learn from. Democratic countries such as Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea have also fought the virus much more effectively than the U.S. and countries across Europe. Why don’t we learn from Asia? Taiwan has managed to completely block local transmission for 200 days. In a population of 23 million and a densely populated metropolitan area, not a single infection has been transmitted, although there have been repeated cases among travelers. South Korea, which has 50 million inhabitants and is almost as large as Italy, has already completely defeated the second wave. Across South Korea, no more than 250 infections were ever recorded in a single day.

Yes, all of these successes have required some sacrifices in terms of citizens’ rights and freedoms. But European countries have, in part, introduced measures that impinge far more drastically on personal liberties – for example, on the right to exercise one’s profession freely. Restrictions of individual freedoms are unavoidable in a pandemic, but they must be appropriate and effective. Neither of these is the case in Europe. Restrictions on freedom are neither appropriate nor effective. We are prepared to paralyse the economy and destroy thousands of livelihoods, but data protection is sacred to us. Unfortunately, the coronavirus crisis offers yet further confirmation: the state is strong where it should be weak (in the economy), and weak where it should be strong.

About the Author

Rainer Zitelmann holds doctorates in history and sociology and is the author of over 20 books including The Power of Capitalism – A Journey Through Recent History Across Five Continents (http://the-power-of-capitalism.com) and The Rich in Public Opinion : What We Think When We Think About Wealth (https://therichinpublicopinion.com) which has recently been published by the Cato Institute.

 

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of All China Review.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here